Difference between revisions of "Talk:Amd64-bulldozer"

From Funtoo
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But `cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86` doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include micro...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But `cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86` doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include microcode that the CPU doesn't actually support?
+
I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But <code>cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86</code> doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include microcode that the CPU doesn't actually support?
  
 
Maybe it would be better to tell the readers to refer to http://www.funtoo.org/News:CPU_FLAGS_X86 for optimization?
 
Maybe it would be better to tell the readers to refer to http://www.funtoo.org/News:CPU_FLAGS_X86 for optimization?

Latest revision as of 08:51, March 20, 2015

I'm working on an AMD FX-6100, which has bulldozer subarch. But cpuinfo2cpuflags-x86 doesn't not include 3dnow nor 3dnowext. I don't think it is a good idea to include microcode that the CPU doesn't actually support?

Maybe it would be better to tell the readers to refer to http://www.funtoo.org/News:CPU_FLAGS_X86 for optimization?